Saturday, January 29, 2011

Week 3: Beyond the Surface.

       Hey everyone, this week we began to view our novel with an eye to its iconography, tone, and metaphor. Let’s take a look!

       Superheroes go infinitely beyond what they’re name expresses them to be: heroes with super powers. These characters are layered with psychology and metaphor; moreover, they often have connections to past myths. This week, we began to look under the mask of our own heroes in Powers with an eye to their psychology and associated metaphors. It is important to recognize these metaphors, psychologies, and connections in order to determine what must be maintained for the film in order to sustain cultural appeal for the audience.
       
       Firstly we would like to discuss the metaphors we noticed in our graphic novel; unfortunately, we could not discover any scholarly articles on this subject, but we uncovered striking evidence of interesting metaphors drawn by Bendis. We noticed parallels between superheroes in Powers and biblical reference. The death of a superhero is notably depicted in a similar fashion to the death of Christ. The superhero is displayed legs together and arms spread out with wrists raised in a pose similar to Jesus on the cross. This depiction is in a single panel which covers the entire page. Moreover, the person who performs the autopsy of the hero notes the difficulty of removing her wrist bands while also stating he took off her “red boots.” Both these attribute to the comparison of removing the nails which held Jesus to the cross. Moreover, this character is later suggested to be a reincarnation of similar strong female characters in history such as “Joan of Arc.” Finally, even the protagonist of Powers is demonstrated to have connections to biblical story. The superheroes are compared to angels whom fly above the city; one superhero suggests that they are “their own gods.” The protagonist, who is a superhero that has lost his powers, is named “Christian Walker.” This name suggests that he is a ‘walking’ Christ-like figure; essentially, he is depicted as a fallen angel. Furthermore, the images used to depict his loss of powers illustrate him fighting a silhouette of a bulky horned figure which demonstrates a connection to the original fallen angel of the bible, Lucifer, in other words, the Devil. This calls us to question if it is beneficial for us to maintain this symbolism when adapting the novel. Do we want to root our story in biblical reference and risk alienating certain audience members? Frankly, the references are subtle and Bendis seems to be careful enough not to parade a belief in the religion, but merely creates parallels to certain aspects of the story. Nonetheless, due to quick spread of information through the internet, any symbolism in the film will spread like wildfire and possible attribute to some controversy; of course, any publicity is good publicity when treated carefully.

       This week we also discussed Frank Miller’s Batman: The Dark Knight Returns which deals with the dark psychology and controversial methods of Gotham’s protector. This, in fact, is the role the media plays in the novel; reporters and guest speakers constantly debate the morals of Batman creating links between him and the villains he mercilessly attacks. Of course, the novel also supplies the reader with the sinister but, nonetheless, rational thoughts of Bruce Wayne as he submerses himself to become the Dark Knight: a protector who emphasises justice over due process. Tim Burton creates a similar dark atmosphere in Gotham within his film Batman. However, the media glorifies the work of Batman rather than questioning his actions throughout. Of course, the film creates a direct connection between Batman and villainy through the reciprocal creation of the Joker and Batman. Thus, the parallels between Batman’s revenge motives and the villains are drawn directly rather than festered to grow through the media as it does in the novel. Burton clearly demonstrated that he was mainly concerned with maintaining the tone and iconography; however, he overlooked the deeper psychology that runs through the novel; nonetheless, this allowed the audience to connect with a much more human character who is capable of turning away from his sinister characteristics and plunge himself into a love story. As we go further into our process of adapting comic to film, we must consider what iconography we wish to transfer and, moreover, if an audience can establish a connection with characters they only know for two hours when they were originally fleshed out in the timelessness of the comic medium.


     

Saturday, January 22, 2011

January 22, 2011 News

Powers: Adapting Comic to Screen - In recent weeks, speculation with the Powers film adaptation has been running rampant. To squelch the proverbial fires of the rumour mill, Film Squash had the opportunity to sit down and exchange a few words with Michael Bendis, creator of the comic, and the production team of the film to shed a bit of light on the project.

             When asked about certain tropes Bendis would like to see in this screen adaptation of his comic, he responded reminiscent of old Superman (Fleischer, 1941): "I think a lot of us remember the super-imposed flashes of optimistic news paper headlines in those shorts. This relationship with media for the superhero genre is a long-standing trope. In [Powers] we included reporters on television running along the bottom of the pages, underneath certain scenes, in order to establish parallels and contrasts. Really, what I'm saying is that I'd love to see these images of television reporters included in the film. Whether it's superimposed like the old Superman shorts' headlines, or in a more innovated fashion that pushes the boundaries of the genre, I’d like to see something that establishes this among film’s long standing superhero genre."

             The production team of this film, however, had even more to say: "While graphic novels such as Watchmen (Snyder, 2008) exhibit close up and personal violence which earns them their R rating when adapted to the screen, Powers does not include violently graphic images. Powers demonstrates what Scott McCloud explains to be “blood in the gutters” in his textbook, Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. There are very simple fight scenes that merely depict a man falling while a fist is raised by another character. The use of onomatopoeia rather than the stylized lines of motion discussed by McCloud also suggests that Bendis prefers motions frozen in time, leaving the reader in full control of imagining how the blows are executed. Bendis uses a red tint within the frame in order to demonstrate the violent nature of the scene; however, the reader is expected to fill in the blanks of the fight. McCloud notes that 'to kill a man between panels is to condemn him to a thousand deaths' (69). The violence of Powers is left to the imagination of the reader; characters are alive in one frame and dead in the next, they’re killed in the reader’s imagination. These techniques can be adapted to the screen. Bendis’ style allows the film maker to withhold gore and maintain a rating below R, thus expanding his possible audience while staying true to the comic. Of course, these techniques, specifically dark colour tints (which Bendis colours his fight scenes with) and implied murders, are tropes of film noir."

 

Saturday, January 15, 2011

January 15, 2011 News


Powers - In light of the recent confirmation that renowned comic book writer/artist Brian Bendis is indeed shopping a treatment of his famous underground series Powers, we here at Film Squash decided to do a little digging and get some background info on the series. Originally published by Image Comics and eventually taken over by Marvel, the series focuses around the adventures of Detectives Christian Walker and Deena Pilgrim. Set in a world where superheroes are part of everyday life, the two detectives navigate a seedy underworld in an effort to solve homicide cases directly related to the superhero world.

            We're told that early word around the water cooler is that Bendis is shopping his treatment as a project with a Sin City type of vibe: apparently, he's pitched a gritty, toned down version of the series' first chapter, "Who Killed Retro Girl?", and studios are chomping at the bit to hear more of what he has to say. Bendis, of course, is one of the most critically acclaimed comic book writers of his generation, and with the huge upswing in the popularity of comic book movies it makes sense that studios would want to hear what he's proposing. We're also hearing that Bendis is aiming to help produce the film as well and that may be a sticking point for some studios who prefer to  bring in their own people. Personally, we at Film Squash are huge fans of Bendis and believe that increased involvement on his part could help keep the film true to the fantastic source material that's being adapted here. The film will be a live action/CGI combination rather then an animated production. 
            
            Of course this wouldn't be a proper film blog if we didn't have some sort of juicy rumor or speculation to post in regards to which celebrities could be linked to the parts. One source close to Bendis said he had always imagined Canadian actor and former Firefly star Nathan Fillion as Detective Christian Walker, but we're also hearing that Aaron Eckhart and David Duchovny are being considered for the role. By the looks of these choices, it would appear Bendis would like the character to appear a little older then his comic book counterpart. No word on who will be reading for Deena Pilgrim just yet, but we here at Film Squash think that someone like Kristen Bell, which her noir background of Veronica Mars, could make for a very convincing Deena. Also no official word on who is being targeted to direct, but a rumored wishlist included both David Fincher and  Edgar Wright. Fincher's dark, gritty style of filmmaking would fit perfectly with the pro-noir approach being lauded by Bendis, and although Wright just finished directing a much more light comic adaptation in Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, he does have experience with darker subject matter from his satirical comedies such as Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. 



Captain America -  In other comic book news, the first official image of Chris Evans as Marvel's Captain America was released this week. While previous set photos had revealed little to no knowledge about the differences between the live action suit and the famous comic book getup, this new image reveals a much more realistic approach then spandex and silver wings on his helmet. The modified flight suit and toned down army helmet look great, and we at Film Squash fully approve of the direction taken by Joe Johnston and his creative team. Captain America hits theaters July 22nd, 2011. (LINK)



Spider - ManWow, what a week for comic book fans. Not only do we get confirmation that a Powers movie is in the works, we get first image shots of Captain America and the new Spider Man! Here we have the first official image released of Andrew Garfield as the new Spider Man. He replaces Tobey Maguire as everyone's favorite web slinging superhero, and by the looks of the claw marks on the front of his suit, the rumors that the Lizard is the main villain may no longer just be rumors. We're hearing Rhys Ifans is indeed playing Dr. Curt Connors, aka The Lizard. And while we here at Film Squash are fully against the rebooting of a series so early, we just need someone to get the taste of the awful Spider Man 3 out of our collective mouths. (LINK)